<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hegel and the Form of Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://grundlegung.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/hegel-and-the-form-of-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://grundlegung.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/hegel-and-the-form-of-law/</link>
	<description>A philosophy blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:37:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ethics and the Moral Law, Part I: Anscombe &#171; Grundlegung</title>
		<link>http://grundlegung.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/hegel-and-the-form-of-law/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethics and the Moral Law, Part I: Anscombe &#171; Grundlegung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 17:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grundlegung.wordpress.com/?p=63#comment-440</guid>
		<description>[...] Grundlegung A philosophy blog    &#171; Zero&#160;Books    Ethics and the Moral Law, Part I:&#160;Anscombe April 5, 2009   Larval Subjects has a good post up on deontological ethics. I am sympathetic to some of his antinomian sentiments, though I often find myself drifting back and forth between Aristotle and Kant in ethics (being the good Hegelian that I am). I&#8217;ve written a little bit about law-conceptions of ethics and their critics, and thought this would be a timely opportunity to post some of the results. This first post will deal with Elizabeth Anscombe and the second will move onto Saint Paul. Readers interested in this topic might also want to have a look at this previous post on Hegel and laws. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Grundlegung A philosophy blog    &laquo; Zero&nbsp;Books    Ethics and the Moral Law, Part I:&nbsp;Anscombe April 5, 2009   Larval Subjects has a good post up on deontological ethics. I am sympathetic to some of his antinomian sentiments, though I often find myself drifting back and forth between Aristotle and Kant in ethics (being the good Hegelian that I am). I&#8217;ve written a little bit about law-conceptions of ethics and their critics, and thought this would be a timely opportunity to post some of the results. This first post will deal with Elizabeth Anscombe and the second will move onto Saint Paul. Readers interested in this topic might also want to have a look at this previous post on Hegel and laws. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roughtheory.org &#187; Anticipating Hegel</title>
		<link>http://grundlegung.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/hegel-and-the-form-of-law/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Roughtheory.org &#187; Anticipating Hegel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 10:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grundlegung.wordpress.com/?p=63#comment-233</guid>
		<description>[...] at Grundlegung, Tom (not Bunyard!) has a fantastic post up on &#8220;Hegel and the Form of Law&#8221;, which also takes inspiration from Hegel&#8217;s prefaces, and then explores some of the threads [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Grundlegung, Tom (not Bunyard!) has a fantastic post up on &#8220;Hegel and the Form of Law&#8221;, which also takes inspiration from Hegel&#8217;s prefaces, and then explores some of the threads [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
